IN TH 135 Devender State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. appropriate Mandamus petitioners, than ten ye Regularizat law laid do connected with all co writ in the and decide respondent CWP-25401-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.25401 o Date of decision nder and others Versus of Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet opriate writ, order or direction, particu damus, directing the respondents to re ioners, who have rendered long and c ten years on their respective posts, larization Policy and in accordance w laid down by this Hon’ble Court in ected matters, decided on 12.05.202 all consequential service benefits; an in the nature of Mandamus directing t decide the representations submitted ndent Nos.2/3 seeking regularization o 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5401 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate , DAG, Haryana. rit petition is for issuance of an particularly a writ in the nature of s to regularize the services of the and continuous service of more posts, in terms of the applicable nce with the settled principles of rt in CWP No.1770 of 2026 and .2026 (Annexure P-13), along its; and further for issuance of a cting the respondents to consider mitted by the petitioners before ation of their services, keeping in VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document view the ap service, th availability order withi the nature petitioners employees with effec consequent and notion annum from the principl No.1770 o (Annexure be admissib 2. petitioners respondent details give that therefo and in term SCC OnLi regularizati 10 years in present pet CWP-25401-2026 (O & M) the applicable Regularization Policy, ce, the continuing requirement of ability of sanctioned posts, by passin r within a stipulated period; and furth ature of Mandamus directing the re ioners pay at par with the regular pay oyees of the State of Haryana hold effect from the date of their en equential benefits, including Dearne notional seniority, together with inte m from the due date till the date of a rinciples and directions laid down by 70 of 2026 and connected matter exure P-13), and to grant all other con missible in accordance with law. It is inter alia submitted by ioners that all the five petitioners ha ndent Department between the years ls given at page 11 in para 7 of the w therefore, in terms of the regularizati in terms of the judgment ‘Jaggo vs. nLine SC 3826’, the petitioners are larization as they have all rendered co ears in the respondent Department.It is nt petition may be disposed of in 2 Policy, their long and continuous nt of their services and the passing a reasoned and speaking further for issuance of a writ in the respondents to grant to the ar pay scale applicable to regular holding identical/similar posts, eir entitlement, along with all earness Allowance, increments h interest at the rate of 6% per of actual payment, in terms of n by this Hon’ble Court in CWP matters, decided on 12.05.2026 her consequential benefits as may ted by learned counsel for the ers have been appointed in the years 2011 to 2013, as per the the writ petition. It is submitted larization Policy dated 18.6.2014 vs. Union of India and others, ers are liable to be considered for red continuous service more than It is, therefore, prayed that the of in terms of the judgment of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Hon’ble Su dated 12.05 bunch of w ‘Deepak Si 3. 4. on behalf o case the p passed in 5. 6. the parties, direction to fresh cons regularizati of 08 mon Hon’ble Su of this Cou 7. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-25401-2026 (O & M) ’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case (s 12.05.2026 passed by a co-ordinate h of writ petitions having leading case ak Singh and others vs. State of Har Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG ehalf of respondent-State and submits the present petition is disposed of i ed in Jaggo’s case (supra). Heard. Accordingly, with the consen arties, present Civil Writ Petition sta tion to the State of Haryana/concern consideration to the claim of eac larization; and pass a speaking order t months from today, while keeping ’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case (su is Court dated 12.05.2026 in Deepak S Pending application(s) if any a 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 se (supra) as well as judgment rdinate Bench of this Court in a g case CWP-1770-2026, titled as Haryana and others’. , DAG, Haryana accepts notice ubmits that he ‘no objection’ in d of in view of the judgment consent of learned counsel for ion stands disposed of, with a oncerned Department to accord each of the petitioners for order thereupon within a period eping in mind the judgment of se (supra) as well as judgment ak Singh’s case (supra). f any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document