Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36082 (KAR)

SMT. NAGARATHNA v. M/S. VENKATESHWARA HATCHERIES PVT. LTD.,

MFA/3636/2023 · 2026-08-17

T M Nadaf

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3636 OF 2023(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGARATHNA, W/O LATE G.R. MUNIVENKATAPPA, NOW AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT M V EXTENSION, 3RD CROSS, BEHIND SUJATHA, KALYANA MANTAP, HOSAKOTE TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI. G.M. RAGHUNATH, S/O LATE G.R. MUNIVENKATAPPA, NOW AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT WARD NO.19, AERO PRIDE LAYOUT, VIJAYAPURA ROAD, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA N., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUSHMITHA G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. VENKATESHWARA HATCHERIES PVT. LTD., SITE NO.6, GANESH CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR, DODDABANASWADI MAIN ROAD, NEAR RAMAMURTHY NAGAR SIGNAL, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 BANGALORE - 560 043. REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR. 2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., MOTOR TP HUB, MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, NO.9, 2ND FLOOR, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR R2, VIDE ORDER DATED 13.08.2026 NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.08.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.4470/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is by claimant seeking enhancement of compensation arising out of judgment and award dated 15.09.2021, in MVC.No.2871/2018 passed by the VIII Additional Small Causes Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (SCCH-5), at Bengaluru1. 2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Tribunal. 3. Heard Sri.Gopal Krishna.N, learned counsel for Smt.Sushmitha.G, learned counsel for the appellant/claimant and Smt.H.R.Renuka, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurer. Vide order dated 13.08.2026, notice of this appeal is dispensed with in respect of respondent No.1. 4. Sri.Gopal Krishna.N, argued this matter only on two counts; first is, the deceased sexagenarian succumbed 1 “Tribunal” for short - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 to the injuries, survived by his wife and a son. The Tribunal has considered the personal expenses towards deceased at 50% instead of 1/3rd. He further submits that in view of settled position of law, the claimants are also entitled for 10% escalation on two terms of three completed years, on the compensation awarded under the convention head, as the accident occurred on 06.08.2020 and sought all allow the appeal. 5. Though Smt.H.R.Renuka, though argued in support of the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal, but she is not in serious dispute with the settled position of law towards personal deduction in case of married person. She further submits that they are entitled for 10% escalation for one completed three years as the accident occurred on 06.08.2020. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the Tribunal taking into consideration of the fact that the deceased was performing - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 Harikatha rightly considered the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.20,000/-. Further in view of 2 completed terms of three years, since 06/08/2020 this Court is of the opinion that Claimants are entitled for 20% escalation. This Court finds force in the argument advanced by Sri.Gopal Krishna.N, learned counsel that the Tribunal erred in deducting 50% instead of 1/3rd towards personal expenses instead of 50%. 7. Accordingly, this Court proceed to reassess the compensation awarded by the Tribunal which is as under: Sl. No. Heads Compensation awarded by the Tribunal In Rs. By this Court In Rs. 1. Loss of dependency 8,40,000-00 11,20,000-00 (20,000x12x7x2/3) 2. Loss of estate 15,000-00 15,000-00 4. Funeral expenses 15,000-00 15,000-00 5. Loss of consortium to wife 40,000-00 40,000-00 6. Loss of parental consortium 40,000-00 40,000-00 6. 20% escalation on two terms of three completed years. - 22,000-00 TOTAL 10,22,300-00 12,52,000-00 - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 8. The claimants are entitled for enhanced compensation of Rs.2,29,700/- (Rs.12,52,000- Rs.10,22,300) rounded off to Rs.2,30,000/- with interest at the rate 6% interest per annum from the date of petition till realization. 9. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceedings pass the following: ORDER (i) The appeal is allowed in part. (ii) The judgment and award dated 17.08.2022 passed by the Tribunal in MVC.No.4470/2020 is modified and enhanced to Rs.2,30,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. (iii) Respondent No.2-Insurer shall deposit the entire enhanced compensation along with - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010266882023 NC: 2026:KHC:43759 MFA No. 3636 of 2023 accrued interest stated supra within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order before the concerned Tribunal. (iv) Upon deposit the entire amount is ordered to be released in favour of the appellant/claimant No.1 (wife) on proper identification. (v) The Registry to send back the trial Court record to the concerned Tribunal, without causing any delay. (vi) No order as to costs. Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 ct-vn