Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010494312026 NC: 2026:KHC:44540 RP NO.403 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.403 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.22252 OF 2021 BETWEEN:
SMT. RAZIYA BEGUM W/O LATE ABDUL KAREEM SAB, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, NO.10, RAZAK SAB PALYA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 562 149. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMED NASIRUDDIN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI. HARISH KUMAR DEVARAJ S/O LATE DEVARAJ NAGAPPA BAGALUR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.
2.
SRI. KISHORE KUMAR DEVARAJ S/O LATE DEVARAJ NAGAPPA BAGALUR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.48, 15TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
3.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010494312026 NC: 2026:KHC:44540 RP NO.403 OF 2026
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENAGALURU - 560 001.
4.
THE LAND TRIBUNAL DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
5.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH, NO.200(N), K.G. ROAD, 2ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU - 560 009.
6.
THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT/ORDER DATED 17TH JUNE, 2026 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.22252 OF 2021 AND RESTORE THE SAME TO FILE AND DISPOSE OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
On perusal of the review petition, it is forthcoming that the petitioner preferred Writ Appeal No.1779 of 2026,
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010494312026 NC: 2026:KHC:44540 RP NO.403 OF 2026
challenging the very same order dated 17th June, 2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.22252 of 2021, which is now sought to be reviewed in the present petition. In that view of the matter, the review petition is not maintainable.
2. Accordingly, Review Petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1