Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36070 (KAR)

SMT MUNIYAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4817/2023 · 2026-08-24

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010111542023 NC: 2026:KHC:45501 WP No. 4817 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4817 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS R/A NO.U-99, 2ND MAIN SWATANTRANAGARA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. 2. SMT. RANI D/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 EYARS R/A NO.U-99, 2ND MAIN SWATANTRANAGARA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. 3. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI D/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO.1174, 2ND MAIN HANUMANTHAPURAM SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010111542023 NC: 2026:KHC:45501 WP No. 4817 of 2023 4. SMT. VIMALA D/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 EYARS R/A NO.U-99, 2ND MAIN SWATANTRANAGARA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. 5. SMT. SARALA D/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.187, I MAIN ROAD 2ND FLOOR HANUMANTHAPURAM SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. 6. SRI. RAVI S/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.U-99, 2ND MAIN SWATANTRANAGARA SRIRAMPURAM BENGALURU-560021. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.V. MOHAN ADEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING BENGALURU -577001. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010111542023 NC: 2026:KHC:45501 WP No. 4817 of 2023 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR D C OFFICE KOLAR-563001. 3. THE TAHASILDAR MALUR TALUK MALUR-563030. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS IN CASE NO.RRT.CR.143/2016-17 DATED 27.05.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 ANNEXURE-A AND IN NO.ND/CR/184/2018-19 DATED 01.08.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 ANNEXURE-A1; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER . The petitioners herein are assailing the order dated 27.05.2019 passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 01.08.2019 passed by respondent No.3 as per Annexures- A - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010111542023 NC: 2026:KHC:45501 WP No. 4817 of 2023 and A1 respectively, iinter alia, have sought for direction to respondent-authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners to enter their names in the revenue records pertaining to the subject land. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, taking into consideration the impugned order passed by respondent No.3, I am of the view that, the petitioners are having efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 3. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority in accordance with law, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SAC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15