Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3606 (JHR)

RAJU PRAJAPATI @ RAJU KUMHAR ALIAS RAJU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7000/2025 · 2026-02-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3188 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.7000 of 2025 Raju Prajapati @ Raju Kumhar @ Raju Kumar, aged about 36 years, son of Jodha Kumhar, resident of Village – Tutilwa, PO & PS – Simariya, District-Chatra …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party With ABA No.17 of 2026 1. Vikash Prajapati @ Lal Chand @ Lal Chand Kumar, age about 31 years, son of Late Ugan Prajapati 2. Shobha Kumari, age about 28 years, wife of Vikash Prajapati @ Lal Chand Both are resident of village- Piparadih, P.O.+P.S.-Barkagaon, Dist.- Hazaribag, Jharkhand. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party With ABA No.366 of 2026 Prakash Prajapati aged about 40-year son of Munsi Prajapati resident of village Piparadih, P.O.-Sanrh, P.S.-Barkagaon, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pradeep Kr. Prasad, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kr. Soni, Advocate Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, APP Mr. Satish Prasad, APP Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, APP (Advocates in respective cases) ------ 2/06.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners in respective cases and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State in respective cases. 2. The cases relate to Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 185 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh. 2026:JHHC:3188 2 3. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in respective cases seeks permission to withdraw these petitions with liberty to move before the learned Cout by filing regular bail applications. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State in respective cases have got no objection. 5. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. It is made clear that if the petitioners move before the learned Court for regular bail, the same will be considered in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this Order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 06.02.2026 R.Kumar