RAJU PRAJAPATI @ RAJU KUMHAR ALIAS RAJU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7000/2025 · 2026-02-06
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3606 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3606 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3188 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.7000 of 2025
Raju Prajapati @ Raju Kumhar @ Raju Kumar, aged about 36 years, son of Jodha Kumhar, resident of Village – Tutilwa, PO & PS – Simariya, District-Chatra
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party With
ABA No.17 of 2026
1. Vikash Prajapati @ Lal Chand @ Lal Chand Kumar, age about 31 years, son of Late Ugan Prajapati
2. Shobha Kumari, age about 28 years, wife of Vikash Prajapati @ Lal Chand Both are resident of village- Piparadih, P.O.+P.S.-Barkagaon, Dist.- Hazaribag, Jharkhand.
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party With
ABA No.366 of 2026
Prakash Prajapati aged about 40-year son of Munsi Prajapati resident of village Piparadih, P.O.-Sanrh, P.S.-Barkagaon, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand.
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Pradeep Kr. Prasad, Advocate
Mr. Santosh Kr. Soni, Advocate
Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, APP
Mr. Satish Prasad, APP
Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, APP
(Advocates in respective cases) ------
2/06.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners in respective cases and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State in respective cases.
2. The cases relate to Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 185 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh.
2026:JHHC:3188 2
3. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in respective cases seeks permission to withdraw these petitions with liberty to move before the learned Cout by filing regular bail applications.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State in respective cases have got no objection.
5. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
6. It is made clear that if the petitioners move before the learned Court for regular bail, the same will be considered in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this Order.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 06.02.2026 R.Kumar