Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36058 (CAL)

SANTOSH KUMAR SHAW v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1755/2026 · 2026-08-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Serial no. 773 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 1755 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Chakdaha PS Case No. 59 of 2025 dated 17.01.2025 u/s 21(c)/25/29 of the NDPS Act. -And- In the matter of : Santosh Kumar Shaw … Petitioner(s) Ms. Karabi Roy … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, ld. APP Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that there has been change of circumstances as one Hare Krishna Roy has been granted bail in the present case. The petitioner happens to be the owner of one of the trucks. It has been claimed that the petitioner had by an agreement handed over the truck to the transporter. Consequently, he had no control over the truck or its business. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that 19,400 bottles of phensedyl were recovered in the present case and so far as the present petitioner is concerned, at the relevant point of time, he is found to have been in communication with one of the 2 accused. There are CDR to that effect. Additionally, there has been money trial available between the petitioner and another accused. Having considered the huge quantum of recovery made in the present case and taking into account the complicity of the present petitioner, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1755 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3