IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12334 of 2018 ====================================================== Sariswa Primary Agruculture Credit Co Operative Society Committee S/o Vipin Bihari Pandey R/o Banket Mushahari Ratanmala, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran. 3. The Additional Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Bettiah Sadar, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. 6. The Circle Officer, Majhaulia, West Champaran. 7. Sanjay Prasad Gupta S/o Madan Prasad Gupta, R/o Village- Sariswa Bazar, P.S. Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advoate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam - AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 16-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i. For cancelling the settlement of sairat of sariswa Bazar in the District of west Champaran for the year 2018-19, made through "Dak" dated- 19.3.2018 in favour of respondent no.7 Sanjay Prasad Gupta by the respondent no.4. ii. For quashing of the letter no.207 dated- 31.3.2018 issued by respondent no. 4 the L.R.D.C. Bettiah whereby and whereunder the Circle Officer Majhaulia (respondent no. 6) has been requested to Patna High Court CWJC No.12334 of 2018(4) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 issue ‘Parwana’ for realization of sairat after making Ekararnama with the settlee of Sairat and report of compliance has been asked to submit. iii. For commanding the respondent to settle the sairat of sariswa Bazar to the Sariswa Primary Agriculture Credit co-operative society committee. iv. Also for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.” 3. On the instruction of Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Satyam Kumar Ojha prays for withdrawal of the petition as it has become infructuous. 4. Permission accorded. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U