- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010674172025 NC: 2026:KHC:45012 MFA No. 7716 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7716 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. PALLAVI @ K B GNANAMBHIKA DAUGHTER OF BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT KABAL VILLAGE, GUNDLUPET TALUK 571111. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. T.N. VISWANATHA.,ADVOCATE) AND: SRI K.S. SATHISH SON OF LATE K.B. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALMAHALLI VILLAGE, NANJANGUD TALUK 571 111. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 12.01.2023 PASSED IN MISC.PET.NO. 09/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/O 9 RULE 13 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, 1908. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010674172025 NC: 2026:KHC:45012 MFA No. 7716 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal filed before this Court is not maintainable in view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 and the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Narayanamma -vs- The State of Karnataka in Writ Petition No.17588 of 2024 (GM-RES) c/w Writ Appeal No.200260 of 2025 (GM-RES) dated 8th July, 2026, which is affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(c) No.025075/2026 dated 3.8.2026. 2. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer this matter to the concerned District Court for adjudication of the matter from the stage where it is stopped. 3. Accordingly, I pass the following: O R D E R i) The appeal stands disposed of for statistical purposes. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010674172025 NC: 2026:KHC:45012 MFA No. 7716 of 2025 ii) Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the case, to the concerned Principal District & Sessions Judge, who may assign it to the concerned Appellate Court having jurisdiction. iii) In case there are pending applications, the same also be transferred to be considered by the learned Judge of the concerned Appellate Court, in accordance with law. iv) It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the concerned Appellate Court. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9