1 CGHC010204542018 2026:CGHC:40681 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 399 of 2018 Ganesh Ram Jaiswal, S/o Late Lala Ram Jaiswal, aged about 72 years, R/o Village Amne, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff) ... Appellant versus 1. Arun Kumar Khalkho, Tahsildar Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgargh. 2. Baleshwar Tiwari, Thana Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Madan Yadav, Thana Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Vinod Yadav, Thana Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Ramjivan, S/o Dulari Yadav 6. Pawan Jaiswal, S/o Chhediram Jaiswal 7. Gokul, S/o Rammurti Jaiswal 8. Shesh Narayan, S/o Mohan Jaiswal 9. Laxmidas Vaishnav, S/o Norattam Jaiswal 10. Padum Vaishnav, S/o Ramdas 11. Bahorik Ram, S/o Tribhuvan 12.Krishan Kumar, S/o Dhirbahra Jaiswal 13.Buduram, S/o Naamalum 14.Santoshi Bai, D/o Budhlal 15.Raju, S/o Radhelal SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.09.18 17:23:51 +0530 2 16. Raja Vaishnav, S/o Rupendra Vaishnav 17.Santuram, S/o Mahettar 18. Rajkumar, S/o Buddhuram Jaiswal No.5 to 18 all R/o Village Amne, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 19. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 20. Secretary, Revenue Department, New Mantralay, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Defendants) ... Respondents For Appellant : None present. For Respondents No.1 to 18 : None present. For Respondents No.19 & 20 : Ms. K. Radhika, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order On Board 17/09/2026 1. This appeal is directed against judgment & decree dated 20-3-2018 passed by the 8th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.47-B/2016, whereby the learned Additional District Judge has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant herein/plaintiff. 2. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the appellant to prosecute the appeal. No representation is made. 3. In absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, the Court has no option except to dismiss the appeal. 4. The first appeal is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Soma