MOHD. AVESH S/O SHRI NISAR ALI v. DIRECTOR AND SPECIAL SECRETARY
CW/3559/2026 · 2026-02-25
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8697] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3559/2026 Mohd. Avesh S/o Shri Nisar Ali, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 72, Mohalla Parijadan, Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Director And Special Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Parivahan Marg, Near Railway Fatak, Shivaji Nagar, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001
2. Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu.
3. Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu.
4. Ramniwas S/o Shri Ramlal, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Village Post Nayasar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 25/02/2026
1. Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the revision petition filed by the respondent No.4 being Revision Petition No.3133/2023 titled as Ramniwas Vs. Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu & Anr. is pending before the Director, Local Self Department, Jaipur for more than two years and the interim order dated 21.12.2023 has been operating since then, therefore, a direction be issued to decide the said revision petition expeditiously.
[2026:RJ-JP:8697] (2 of 2) [CW-3559/2026]
2.
Learned counsel further submits that reply to the revision petition has been filed by the petitioner as well as the Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu and the pleadings are also completed therein.
3. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions and without delving into the merits of the matter, it is directed that the said Revision Petition No.3133/2023 titled as Ramniwas Vs. Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu & Anr. be decided by the Director, Local Self Department, Jaipur within a period of four months from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law, by passing a speaking and reasoned order after granting an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only for the purpose of directing expeditious disposal of the revision petition and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the same in a particular manner.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /10