RAM KUNWAR GURJAR S/O LATE RAM KARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3329/2026 · 2026-04-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3601 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3601 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14270] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3329/2026 Ram Kunwar Gurjar S/o Late Ram Karan, R/o Shuklon Ki Dhani, Mundota, Police Station Kalwad, District Jaipur, Formerly Working As Lab Technician (Placement Personnel), Rajkiya Janana Chikitsalaya, Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodge At Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Shaktawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.44/2026 registered at Police Station C.P.S Jaipur, District ACB District for offences under Section 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not employed in regular services and was working as a lab technician through service provider agency on a contract basis. Though there is an allegation that the petitioner has demanded Rs.30,000/- and accepted Rs. 25,000/- as illegal gratification on the pretext of appointment of complainant as
[2026:RJ-JP:14270] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3329/2026] Trolley Puller, he contends that this amount was received as a security deposit for the advertised post. Petitioner is behind the bars since 10.02.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ram Kunwar Gurjar S/o Late Ram Karan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/32