Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35993 (CAL)

KARTICK PAUL v. JAGADISH PRASAD MINA THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPTT OF CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION

CPAN/285/2024 · 2026-08-27

Apurba Sinha Ray

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 29 27.08.2026 Court No.550 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CPAN 285 of 2024 In WPA 5691 of 2020 Kartick Paul Vs. Jagadish Prasad Mina Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Ld. AGP Mr. Arijit Bhowmick … for the Alleged Contemnor. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. It appears that from the record that on last occasion also the learned counsel for the petitioner remains absent. 3. Learned counsel for the alleged contemnor submits compliance report showing that the order, willful violation of which has been complained of in the present application for contempt, has been complied with. 4. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the contempt application any further. 5. Accordingly, CPAN 285 of 2024 stands disposed of. 6. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)