[2026:RJ-JP:13185] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2724/2013 1. Jagdish Narayan Saini Son Of Late Shri Nanagram Saini, Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Mahesh Saini (Son), Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Madhu Saini (Daughter), Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Shanti Kumar And Rajesh Kumar Son Of Late Shri Nana- gram Saini, Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. Neetu Saini (Daughter), Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Gopal Lal Saini Son Of Late Shri Nanagram Saini, Resi- dent Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 7. Sunita Devi (Daughter), Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) 8. Ramnarayan Saini Son Of Late Shri Nanagram Saini, Resi- dent Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 9. Rekha Saini (Daughter), Resident Of House No. 1454, Baba Harish Chandra Marg, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Principle Secretary, Local Self Department, Secretar- iat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:13185] (2 of 2) [CW-2724/2013] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/03/2026 During the course of the argument, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner is having alternative statutory remedy of appeal / reference under the provisions of JDA Act as regards the grievances raised in the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length made a limited prayer that he may be permitted to invoke the alternative remedy before the JDA Tribunal. In view of the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy available to him under law as regards the grievances raised in the present writ petition. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /62