Neutral Citation:__________ Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 30.06.2026 APHC010425172015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8745/2015 Between: 1. LANKE VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O, VENKATESWARA RAO,, AGED 44 YEARS, D.N0.14-118,(OLD 13-86) 2. VELAGAPUDI VISWANATH S/O NAGESWARA RAO, , AGED 29 YEARS, D.NO 14-111, 3. VELAGAPUDI HARIBABU S/O, NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS,, D.NO 14-110, 4. DANAPANENI CHINNAMMA W/O BALAKOTI, AGED 40 YEARS,, D.NO 13-85/1,(NEW 14-117), 5. .NADITOKA NAGAMALLESWARI, W/O, UMAMAHESWARARAO ,, AGED 47 YEARS,D.NO 13-89 (NEW 14-121), 6. NADITOKA VENKATESWARARAO, S/O CHANDRAYYA, , AGED 50 YEARS, D.NO 13-89 (NEW 14-119), 7. NADITOKA PRASAD S/O CHANDRAYYA, AGED 45 YEARS,, D.NO 14-119/A 8. NADITOKA KOTESWARARAO, S/O CHANDRAYYA, AGED 44 YEARS,, D.NO 4-160(14-119/B 9. NADITOKA RAMARAO S/O, CHANDRAYYA, AGED 36 YEARS,, D,NO 14-120, 10. PALAKURTHI KRISHNA S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 35YEARS,, D.NO 13-90/1,(NEW 14-123) (ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF PEDA PULIPAKA ROAD YANAMALAKUDURU VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPLE 2 SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, ABIDS, HYDERABAD 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. SRI RAMALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE YENAMALAKUDURU, VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ or order or orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring the action of the respondents in partly demolishing the houses of the Petitioner situated in pedapulipaka road, Yenamalakuduru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District without following law or without giving any notice whatsoever as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondnet not to demolish furhter and not to evict the petititoners from thier respective houses in pedapulika road, Yenamalakuduru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 2370 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt:01.04.2015 made in WP.No.8745 / 2015 IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 11540 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent not to demolish furhter and not to evict the petititoners from thier respective houses in pedapulipaka road, Yenamalakuduru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP 44456 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive these documents as additional papers in WP No. 8745 of 2015 and to pass IA NO: 6 OF 2015(WPMP 53375 OF 2015 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.8745 of 2015 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, it indicates that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.06.2026 KBN Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 17 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 8745 of 2015 Date: 25.06.2026 KBN