102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.45063 of 2026 Date of decision: 13.08.2026 Gaurav Khanna …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Sumit Guleria, Advocate (joined through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1-State. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on the record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 3. Permitted to do so. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty afore said. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 13.08.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.08.13 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD