Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3598 (UTT)

SOBAN SINGH BHANDARI v. UNION OF INDIA

WPSS/787/2023 · 2026-04-21

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 21.04.2026 WPSS No. 787 of 2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Shubhang Dobhal and Mr. Bhupendra Bora, Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous, as petitioner has crossed the age of 55 years, and as per applicable rules, extension of service can only be given up to the age of 55 years. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as rendered infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 21.04.2026 Mahinder/