Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3598 (RAJ)

VINOD YADAV S/O SHRI BHAINROO RAM YADAV, v. SMT. GAYATRI RATHORE

CCP/225/2025 · 2026-03-16

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10910] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 226/2025 Krishna Mahawar D/o Jai Narayan Mahawar, Aged About 33 Years, Ghati Korolan, Kho Nagoriyan New Jagatpura Road, Jaipur, (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma-I, Director, (Non Gazette) Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gochar, Deputy Director, (Non Gazette) Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 225/2025 Vinod Yadav S/o Shri Bhainroo Ram Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 181, Shyam Vihar Visthar, Girdharipura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma-I, Director, (Non Gazettee) Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gochar, Deputy Director, (Non Gazette) Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, [2026:RJ-JP:10910] (2 of 2) [CCP-226/2025] Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Keshav Parashar, Adv. for Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. TAnvisha Pant, Adv. for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submitted that the contempt petitions have become infructuous. 2. Such statement has not been opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In view of above, these contempt petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /75-76