1 CGHC010337362025 2026:CGHC:40520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 794 of 2025 Kumari Bai D/o Balaram Aged About 70 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), (Plaintiff) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Tarachand S/o Balaram Aged About 70 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.), (Defendants) 2 - Baijanti D/o Prahlad, W/o Phulchand Aged About 58 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Fulchand S/o Prahlad Aged About 59 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 4 - Lekhram S/o Prahlad Aged About 55 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 5 - Kunti D/o Prahlad Aged About 50 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 6 - Neera D/o Prahlad Aged About 40 Years Caste - Kalar, R/o Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 7 - Krishna Bai D/o Lekhram, W/o Vinod Kalar Aged About 34 Years R/o Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.09.16 18:31:59 +0530 2 Village - Bhanta, P/s And Post - Phaguram, Tahsil - Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 8 - Omkara Bai D/o Tarachand, W/o Ashok Kalar Aged About 40 Years R/o Sidhitrai, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey. Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 16/09/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under law. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned State counsel. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the annexures to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies of the same. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok