- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010455642022 NC: 2026:KHC:44905 RSA.CROB No. 14 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA RSA CROSS OBJECTION NO.14 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: H M KANTHARAJU S/O MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT HADENAHALLI VILLAGE SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …CROSS OBJECTOR (BY SRI. SATHISHA D J, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. A T THIMMEGOWDA S/O LATE THIMMARAYIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT AGALAHALLI VILLAGE HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 201. 2. SMT NINGAMMA W/O H C KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 3. H C KRISHNA S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 4. MAHALAKSHMI D/O H C KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010455642022 NC: 2026:KHC:44905 RSA.CROB No. 14 of 2022 5. CHELUVARAJU S/O H C KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE R/AT HIRISAVE VILLAGE AND HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA.CROB IN RSA 884/2017 IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 22 R/W SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2017 PASSED IN RA No.61/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN DISTRICT (SIT AT CHANNARAYAPATNA) ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.01.2015 PASSED IN O.S.No.22/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CHANNARAYAPATNA. THIS RSA.CROB, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the cross objector has filed memo which reads as under: “The appeal filed by the appellants in RSA 884/2017 by challenging the judgment and decree passed in RA 61/2015 is dismissed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 18.08.2026. In view of the dismissal of the above appeal the cross-objection filed by the defendant No.5/respondent No.5 before - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010455642022 NC: 2026:KHC:44905 RSA.CROB No. 14 of 2022 the Court below not survive for consideration. In view of the same, permit the cross objector to withdraw the above cross objection as not pressed. In view of the withdrawal of above cross appeal this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the Rigstry to refund the Court fee in favour of the cross-objector in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57