Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3595 (GAU)

M/S SUNSTEELS (INDIA) v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/79/2026 · 2026-02-08

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010254792025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/79/2026 M/S SUNSTEELS (INDIA) A PARTNERSHIP CONCERN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT MITHAPUKHURI ROAD, JORHAT AND IS REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS PARTNER, SRI SAJAN KUMAR AGARWAL, SON OF LT. RAM KISHORE AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DEWAL ROAD, JORHAT IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, SECOND FLOOR, BLOCK-B, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HENGRABARI HEALTH COMPLEX HENGRABARI ROAD LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781036 3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER (PHE) UPPER ASSAM ZONE NAGAON NORTH HAIBARGAON LAWKHOWA ROAD NAGAON Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-782002 4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING JORHAT CIRCLE NA-ALI JORHAT-785001 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE) GOLAGHAT DIVISION SATI JAYMATI PATH JONAKINAGAR GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-78561 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G N SAHEWALLA, MS K SARMA,MS S AGARWAL,MS T J SAHEWALLA,MR M SAHEWALLA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P H E, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 09.02.2026 Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. S. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Mr. R.R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE Department appearing for the official respondents has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer so made. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sahewalla, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant