IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 162 CR-5482-2026 Date of decision: 13.08.2026 Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Sharma . . . . Petitioner Vs. Raj Kumar Pujara . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the petitioner **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The operative portion of the order passed by this Court on 27.07.2026 is as under: - “The petitioner shall place on record a demand draft of at least 2,00,000/- to show his bona fides. In the meantime and till the next date of hearing, the auction sale of the property shall remain stayed. It is made clear that in case the demand draft of 2,00,000/- is not produced by the next date of hearing, the executing Court shall be at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law. 3. It is reported by the Registry that no demand draft or any other document has been received in the Branch. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present in order to show the compliance of the aforesaid order dated 27.07.2026. 5. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuant the petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 13.08.2026 JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.08.13 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document