2026:JHHC:2028 1 C.M.P. 40 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 40 of 2026 Indrani Roy @ Indrani Das, aged about 52 years, d/o Late Ambrish Chandra Roy, r/o Village- Chapafuli, P.O.- Raghunathpur, P.S.- Ranishwar, District- Dumka. ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. Udai Roy 2. Jaideo Roy 3. Basudeo Roy, all sons of Late Sourish Roy, r/o Village- Chapafuli, P.O- Raghunathpur, P.S. Ranishwar, District- Dumka .........Opposite Party(s)/Defendants 4. Hariday Roy, S/o Late Kumrish Roy 5. Uttam Roy, S/o Late Kumrish Roy, both 4 & 5 R/o village- Chapafuli, P.O.-Raghunathpur, P.S.- Ranishwar, District- Dumka 6. Kakoli Sarkar, W/o Paresh Kumar Sarkar, r/o village-Podomkandi, P.O.- Podomkandi, P.S.- Khargram, District-Birbhum, West Bengal. 7. Manorma Roy 8. Papul Roy, both Respondent no. 7 & 8 D/o late Satyanarayan Roy, r/o Village-Aminpur, P.O- Bahiri, P.S.- Bolepur, District-Birbhum, West Bengal. 9. Subhas Roy 10. Bibhas Roy, both S/o late Shantimayee Roy, г/о village-Nawadih, P.O.- Nagori, P.S.-Suri, District-Birbhum, West Bengal. 11. Parama Roy w/o Tapan Roy, r/o Suri, behind Meena Nursing Home, SP more, P.O.-Nagori, P.S.-Suri, District- Birbhum, West Bengal. 12. Niyoti Roy, w/o Phalgoni Roy, r/o village- Goal Danga, P.S-Chandrakona P.O.- Goal Danga, District-West Midnapur West Bengal 13. Dipankar Roy @ Dipu 14. Shubankar Roy @ Apu 15. Surojit Roy @ Babu, Respondent No.13,14 & 15 son of late Ullashi Roy and Late Nirmal Roy 16. Basanti Roy, 17. Bulbuli Roy, both d/o late ullashi Roy and late Nirmal Roy, all R/o village- Bandh Nabogram, P.O.-Kasta, P.S.-Bolpur, District- Birbhum, West Bengal. 18. Pradip Kumar Sadhu, S/o Jagarnath Sadhu, r/o village- Ranishwar, P.O- Ranishwan P.S.-Ranishwar, Distritct-Dumka .......... Performa Defendants ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : 02/27.01.2026 The present C.M.P. has been filed for the following relief(s): For quashing the order dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure-4) 2026:JHHC:2028 2 C.M.P. 40 of 2026 passed by the learned Court of Sub-Judge-II, Dumka in T.(P).S. No. 09 of 2012 whereby and whereunder the learned Court has dismissed the application dated 24.03.2025 filed on behalf of the petitioner/ plaintiffs for closing the evidence of P.W.-3 and not allowing the Opposite parties to cross examine the Plaintiff witnesses in view of the fact that the opposite parties have been debarred from filing the written statement.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present CMP with a liberty to pursue his remedy in accordance with law by raising all the plea in the pending trial. 3. It has been submitted that the suit is of the year 2012 but the respondents are trying to delay the matter. 4. Without making any observation, it is expected that the Court below will proceed in the matter in right earnest and dispose of the pending suit as early as possible. 5. With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, the present C.M.P. stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 27.01.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026