Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35929 (CAL)

BISWAJIT DUTTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1281/2026 · 2026-08-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.240. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 1281 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nischinda Police Station case no. 69 of 2024 dated 08.06.2024 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Biswajit Dutta ……Petitioner. Mr. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for two years three months. Learned advocate has produced the certified copy of the evidence and emphasized that the relations have all become hostile and as such, prosecution has been diluted. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary and opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that another witness is left. Be that as it may, I have perused the evidence which has been relied upon by the learned advocate for the petitioner and I find that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted in the facts of the case. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Biswajit Dutta shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Howrah without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) 1281 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. Depositions submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner be also kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)