- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20151 CRL.P No. 3035 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3035 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI AKSHAY VAIDIAN S/O. LATE THOMAS ALEXANDER, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.7, PAPPALI ENCLAVE, VAZHAKALA, ERNAKUALAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE-682 030. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAIK VENKATRAMAN NAGAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20151 CRL.P No. 3035 of 2026 BENGALURU CITY, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. B.PUSHPALATHA, ADDL.SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2026, PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-63), IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.1075/2026, WHEREIN, REJECTED THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 439 (1) (B) OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, FOR RELAXATION OF BAIL CONDITION NO.2., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20151 CRL.P No. 3035 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. Naik Venkatraman Nagappa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. B. Pushpalatha, learned Additional Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before the Court seeking relaxation of the condition that he should mark his attendance on every second Saturday between 10:00a.m. to 05:00p.m. before the jurisdictional police. The petitioner is said to be a resident of Kerala has got embroiled in the subject crime qua accused Nos.1 and 2, the Co-ordinate Bench has granted an interim order of stay and which is subsisting. Therefore, the investigation has not progressed for the last three years. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that marking attendance every 30 days has become too onerous, as he has to take care of his age old mother. Therefore, seeks relaxation or exemption from appearance, while exemption cannot be granted, the relaxation only would - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20151 CRL.P No. 3035 of 2026 be that the petitioner would mark his attendance once in 60 days instead of 30 days. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14