Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 30.06.2026 APHC010767512016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2033/2016 Between: 1. M S KUMARI, W.G.DIST, W/O.RAJA RAO, AGE:57 YEARS,OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O.TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. ASSN FOR PROMOTING SPIRITUAL SOCIO RJY E G DIST 9 OTRS, SOCIO ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, REGD. NO.571/84, REPRESENTED BY ITS ALLEGED PRESIDENT NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, S/O.LATE SEETAPATHI, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, T-3, FLAT NO.403, SRI SAIBABA RESIDENCY, TILAK ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRIT. 2. KAMBAMPATI KOTESWATA RAO, S/0.MURAHARI RAO, AGED:64 YEARS, R/O.JAGANNADHAPURAM, NOWABPALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, S/O.LATE SEETAPATHI, PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTING SPIRITUAL & SOCIO ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, R/O. OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY. 4. ANISETTI VENKATA CHALAM, S/O.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED:50 YEARS, BUSINESS, C/O.NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, R/O. OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY. 5. VALLEPALLI SREERAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O.BAPANNA, HINDU, AGED:60 YEARS, C/O.NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, R/O. OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY 6. DINDI BHASKAR SRINIVAS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA NARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.0-17, JAMPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY. 7. YARRA NAGABABU, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-2-9, JAMPETA , RAJAHMUNDRY. 8. SAGIREDDY VENKATA CHALAMA REDDY, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, HINDU, AGE: 50 YEARS, R/O.UPPALAPADU VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL. 9. VENKATESWARA CO RAJAHMUNDRY, REP. BY K.B.KRISHNA, S/O.SURYA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.24-14-3/1, R.V.NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY 10. KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT KALIDINDI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, HINDU, AGED:52 YEARS, CHAITANYA NAGAR, VELUGUBANDA VILLAGE, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the Judgment in I.A.No.1554/2014 in O.S.No.1291/2006, dt.3-8-2015 on the file of I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 2613 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS No.1291/2006 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANDA ADAM The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2033/2016 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff, assailing the order dated 03.08.2015 passed by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), in I.A.No.1554 of 2014 in O.S.No.1291 of 2006. By the impugned order, the Trial Court dismissed the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner Under Order IV Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Rule 28 of the Civil Rules of Practice, seeking amendment of plaint and consequential reliefs. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the main suit in O.S.No.1291 of 2006 itself was dismissed by the Trial Court on 01.11.2024. He further contends that, in view of the dismissal of the main suit, the present Civil Revision Petition directed against the interlocutory order no longer survives for independent adjudication and has, therefore, become infructuous. 3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 25.06.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes 153 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2033/2016 Date: 25.06.2026 SAK