Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35896 (KAR)

SRI. MUTHURAYA REDDY v. SRI. SURENDRA K

CCC/906/2025 · 2026-08-19

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010471452025 NC: 2026:KHC:44588-DB CCC No. 906 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUTHURAYA REDDY S/O OF LATE SRI. NANJAPPA. AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. SRI. M.LAKSHMIKANTHA S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. LOKESH.P.B. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE BYRAPPA, 4. SRI. M.LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, COMPLAINANTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT, PAPAREDDY PALYA, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, 11TH BLOCK, NISARGA ORCHARDS, BENGALURU-560 072. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA.S., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010471452025 NC: 2026:KHC:44588-DB CCC No. 906 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. SURENDRA.K S/O LATE N.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 2. SRI. NALLAPPA.K. S/O LATE N.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NALLAPPA TRANSPORT, PAPAREDDY PALYA, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 072. 3. SMT. BHAVYA.Y.R. D/O LATE Y.V.RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 4. SRI. VASU HUSBAND OF SMT. BHAVYA.Y.R. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.91, 1ST CROSS, 4TH MAIN, H.V.R. EXTENSION, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, OPP. CHECK POST, BENGALURU – 560 079. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR A1; SRI. A.RAJESH., ADVOCATE FOR A3 & A4) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010471452025 NC: 2026:KHC:44588-DB CCC No. 906 of 2025 TAKE COGNIZANCE OF CIVIL CONTEMPT AGAINST ALL THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING AND NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN RFA NO.615/2025, DATED 17.04.2025 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) This contempt case is filed alleging disobedience of the order of this Court in RFA No.615/2025, dated 17.04.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the allegation is against the accused Nos.3 and 4, who are not parties to the suit. It is also not in dispute that the order of status-quo granted on 17.04.2025 is an order in the nature of an injunction. If there is any alleged violation thereof, it is for the complainant to seek its remedy under the provisions of Order 39, Rule 2A of the - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010471452025 NC: 2026:KHC:44588-DB CCC No. 906 of 2025 CPC and not under the Contempt of Courts Act. The contempt petition is therefore consigned. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19