Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35880 (KAR)

SMT. UMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/25666/2026 · 2026-08-19

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010563332026 NC: 2026:KHC:44921 WP No. 25666 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25666 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA W/O LATE H. CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SMT. PRATHIKSHA, D/O LATE H. CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 3. KUM. NIROOSHA, D/O LATE H. CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, THE PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.91, 3RD CROSS, CHIKKALAKSHMIAHA LAYOUT, BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 029. 4. SMT. LAKSHMI, D/O HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.183, 7TH CROSS, KODIHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH, H. A. L. BENGALURU -560 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010563332026 NC: 2026:KHC:44921 WP No. 25666 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDHAR, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/05/2026, GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2, FOR MUTATION OF REVENUE ENTRIES AND SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE LAND IN QUESTION IN TO THEIR JOINT NAMES BY WAY OF PAUTHI VARASU, WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010563332026 NC: 2026:KHC:44921 WP No. 25666 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioners in this writ petition have sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation made by the petitioner at Annexure-A and to enter their names in the revenue records. 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioners at Annexure-A in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35