CRM-M- 3544 IN THE (230) SARVAR STATE OF HA CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr *** MANISHA BA 1. Th 483 of Bharati grant of regula registered unde of Bharatiya Ny Khera, District B 2. Th complaint filed persons named Revenue Depar conspiracy, the Subsequently, a other document 35442-2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MAN Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana **** A BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed haratiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, regular bail in case arising out of F under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), iya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “B istrict Bhiwani. The aforementioned FIR was regis t filed by the complainant-Suresh Ku amed in the complaint some of wh Department, had connived with each y, the complainant was made to sig ntly, accused Sansar procured his sign uments on the pretext of getting the m JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-35442-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.08.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioner aryana filed by the petitioner under Section nhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for t of FIR No.263 dated 02.09.2025 36(3), 340(2), 238(c), 316(5), 61(2) ort “BNS”) at Police Station Bawani s registered on the basis of a written esh Kumar alleging therein that the of whom were the officials of the h each other. In pursuance of their to sign a Panchayati compromise. is signatures on some affidavits and the mutation corrected. By way of ction for 2025 1(2) wani ritten t the f the their mise. and ay of AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M- 3544 concealment, so his share in the fact on 27.07.2 such, he prayed 3. Aft initiated. Acc interrogation, h the crime of pre certificates of petitioner for th by depriving h disclosure, the 18.03.2026. On effect that he w Aadhaar cards, the accused Sa false death cert 2,000/-. He dis used in his CSC were signed a concluded. 4. It i falsely implicat 35442-2026 (O&M) 2 ent, some proceedings were initiated in the property. The complainant som 7.07.2025 when he was not provided rayed for taking action in the matter. After registration of FIR, inv Accused Virender @ Pappu was tion, he suffered disclosure statement of preparing forged and fabricated do s of his brother Mahabir and siste for the purpose of using those docume ing his family members of some p e, the petitioner was nominated as a 6. On interrogation, he too suffered t he was running a CSC centre in vill cards, job cards and family ID cards, e ed Sansar Singh and Virender @ Pa th certificates of Maya Devi and Ma e disclosed that he had prepared th is CSC centre and was not aware as ned and sealed. Investigation qua It is argued by learned counsel for plicated in this case on the basis o tiated to deprive the complainant of t somehow came to know about this ovided with the latest mutation. As atter. , investigation proceedings were was arrested on 10.02.2026. On ement admitting his involvement in ated documents in the form of death d sister Maya through the present ocuments for securing undue benefit ome property. On the basis of his d as accused. He was arrested on uffered disclosure statement to the in village Puthi. He used to prepare ards, etc. in his centre. On asking of @ Pappu Bansal, he had prepared d Mahabir in lieu of a sum of Rs. red those certificates on the format as to by whom those certificates n qua the petitioner now stands sel for the petitioner that he has been asis of disclosure statement of co- nt of t this . As were . On nt in eath esent nefit f his d on the pare ng of ared f Rs. rmat cates tands been - AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M- 3544 accused, which was not named booked are not proceedings or the principal or Magistrate. His ready to abide b bail in another deserves to be r 5. Pe a habitual offen registered again prepared fake d It is, therefore 6. Th counsel for the p 7. Th of Maya Devi allegations mak against him. Ho months. The tri obviously take justified. The s proposition of l 35442-2026 (O&M) 3 which cannot be considered to be lega amed in the FIR. The ingredients of o re not attracted qua him. He had no gs or in concealment of files. It is th ipal orchestrator of the crime. The s e. His further incarceration will not se abide by the terms and conditions to b nother case registered against him. It to be released on bail. Per contra, learned State counsel h l offender since one more case of against him. He acted in connivance fake death certificates. Allegations aga efore, argued that the petition does not This Court has heard the rival s or the parties at considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to have p Devi and Mahabir in connivance s make out a prima facie case for com im. However, he has remained in cus he trial has not even been commence take considerable time. Continued de The subject offences are triable by of law is that bail is the rule and e legally admissible in evidence. He ts of offences for which he has been had no role in the judicial/revenue It is the co-accused Virender who is The subject offences are triable by not serve any fruitful purpose. He is s to be imposed upon him. He is on him. It is, therefore, argued that he unsel has argued that the petitioner is e of cheating and forgery has been ivance with the co-accused and had ns against him are serious in nature. es not deserve to be allowed. rival submissions made by learned ave prepared false death certificates ivance with the co-accused. The or commission of subject offences as in custody for a period of over five menced so far and, therefore, it will ued detention of the petitioner is not le by Magistrate. The well settled e and jail is an exception. Pre-trial e. He been enue ho is e by He is is on at he er is been had ture. rned cates The es as five will s not ttled trial AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M- 3544 incarceration sh of the jail is to s preventive or p this Court is of to the petitione petitioner is ord as well as sure Judicial Magistr 8. It i not be construed case and shall 9. Sin any, is rendered 18.08.2026 Amit Sharma 35442-2026 (O&M) 4 tion should not be replica of post-conv l is to secure appearance of the accuse e or punitive. Taking into considerat t is of the considered opinion that a ca titioner at this stage. Accordingly, th is ordered to be released on bail sub s surety bonds to the satisfaction of agistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned. It is, however, clarified that the o nstrued as an expression of opinion of shall not influence the outcome of the t Since the main petition has been ndered infructuous. (M Whether speaking/reasoned:- Whether reportable:- Yes/No conviction sentencing. The object accused during trial, and it cannot be sideration the above discussed facts, at a case is made out for grant of bail gly, the petition is allowed and the ail subject to his furnishing personal ion of the learned trial Court/Chief erned. t the observations made above shall ion of this Court on the merits of the of the trial in any manner. allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE - Yes/No bject ot be acts, f bail the sonal hief shall f the n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.19 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.