IN TH 120 Kiran Bala State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appropriate Certiorari, (Annexure dispensed w any specifi SDCs had having sub (Annexure the Haryan and for issu in the natu CWP-23642-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.23642 o Date of decision n Bala and others Versus Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, A for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petitio opriate writ, order or direction, par orari, for quashing the impugned exure P-6), whereby the services nsed with and they were relieved from pecific reason, except on the ground th s had not been received, despite sim g subsequently been reinstated vid exure P-12) and having been held en aryana Contractual Employees (Secu or issuance of an appropriate writ, ord e nature of Mandamus, directing the r 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3642 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA waj, Advocate ddl. A.G., Haryana. A.G., Haryana. petition is for issuance of an n, particularly in the nature of ugned order dated 24.12.2014 rvices of the petitioners were ed from service without assigning ound that sanction for the posts of ite similarly situated employees d vide order dated 22.07.2025 eld entitled to the benefits under (Security of Service) Act, 2024; rit, order or direction, particularly g the respondents to reinstate the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioners services in 2), as the p prescribed cause of ac dated 22.07 the earlier 31.05.2018 16.04.2026 India, whe aside/overr legal and v the applica petitioners, that the pe issued to representat stated to be notice and counsel for claim raise CWP-23642-2026 (O & M) ioners in service and, thereafter, con ces in accordance with the policy date s the petitioners were in service as o ribed under the said policy, particu e of action arising in favour of the pe 22.07.2025 (Annexure P-12), notwi earlier writ petition filed by the pe 5.2018 (Annexure P-8), and further in 4.2026 (Annexure P-13) passed by the , whereby the judgment in Yoge /overruled and the policy dated 18.06 and valid; and directing the responde pplication dated 28.04.2026 (Annexu ioners, in accordance with law and wit At the outset, learned counsel the petitioners would be satisfied, at d to respondent No.2 to consider sentation/application dated 28.4.2026 d to be pending consideration. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Add e and has no objection in case the limi sel for the petitioner is accepted. Without expressing any opin raised by the petitioner, and in view 2 er, consider and regularize their y dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P- e as on the relevant cut-off date articularly in view of the fresh the petitioners pursuant to order notwithstanding the dismissal of the petitioners vide order dated her in view of the judgment dated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Yogesh Tyagi has been set 18.06.2014 has been upheld as spondents to consider and decide nnexure P-14), submitted by the nd within a time-bound manner. ounsel for the petitioners submits ed, at this stage, if a direction is sider and decide the aforesaid .2026 (Annexure P-14), which is , Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts e limited prayer made by learned y opinion on the merits of the view of the limited relief sought, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the present No.2 to c 28.4.2026 in accordan receipt of a opinion on and the co accordance of. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-23642-2026 (O & M) resent writ petition is disposed of wit to consider and decide the repres .2026 (Annexure P-14) by passing a sp cordance with law, within a period of pt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Co ion on the entitlement of the petition competent authority shall take a rdance with the applicable rules and re Pending application(s), if any 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 of with a direction to respondent representation/application dated ng a speaking and reasoned order, iod of 06 months from the date of is Court has not expressed any etitioners to the claimed benefit, take an independent decision in and regulations. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document