Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35851 (CAL)

ANIKUL ISLAM @ TOUSIF @ TOUSHIT v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2075/2026 · 2026-08-25

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Sl.No. 11 Ct. 39 Allowed Amalranjan In The High Court At Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRM (A) No. 2075 of 2026 In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/corresponding to under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; filed in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 297 of 2026 dated 29.03.2026 under Sections 21(b)/27A/29 of NDPS Act, 1985 corresponding PTN no. 2630 of 2026. -And- In the matter of : Anikul Islam @ Tousif @ Toushit … Petitioner Mr. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen Mr. Anwar Hossain ….for the petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. Sayan Mukherjee Ms. Namrata Chatterjee ……..for the State 1. In pursuant to the order dated 19.08.2026, a report filed by the SI, Tupgeay Lepcha, Baishnabnagar PS, Malda as well as the memo of evidence filed by the State in court today are taken on record. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the present petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of co-accused statement and he further submits that there is no antecedent against the present 2 petitioner. He prays for anticipatory bail on any terms and conditions. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State produces the case diary, memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on record, the memo of evidence as well as the case diary it appears that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, only on the basis of co-accused statement. There were no contraband items recovered from his possession, no antecedents against him, no money trail and no call record detail collected during the investigation against the present petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Anikul Islam @ Tousif @ Toushit is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at 3 liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 8. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 9. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 10. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )