GAYASUDDIN AHAMAD v. SHRI SATYENDRA KUMAR POSTED AS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 4 OTHERS
CAPL/1563/2026 · 2026-05-05
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1563 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Personal affidavit of opposite party no. 1 has been filed today, which is taken on record.
2. Applicant before this Court had filed Writ-C No. 15192 of 2025 which was disposed of on 20.5.2025.
3. Contempt proceedings were initiated by the applicant against the State officials as well as officials of Nagar Nigam.
4. Sri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of Nagar Nigam Varanasi and states that a notice under Section 331 (1) (2) of U.P. Nagar Nigam Adhiniyam, 1959 has been issued against the applicant which has not been responded till date. According to him, no demolition activity has been carried out by the State authorities. He further submits that Nagar Nigam Varanasi is not a party in writ proceedings and contempt proceedings have been initiated against the Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Varanasi, while only a notice has been issued by Nagar Nigam.
5. No case for contempt is made out. Contempt application stands dismissed. May 6, 2026 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Khalid Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bipin Bihari Pandey (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Gayasuddin Ahamad .....Applicant(s) Shri Satyendra Kumar Posted As District Magistrate And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad