- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010026732021 NC: 2026:KHC:45991 CRL.P No. 609 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 609 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SRI UMASHANKAR S S/O LATE SRIKANTAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO. 2255/1, 5TH CROSS BASAVESHWARA ROAD, K.R. MOHALLA MYSURU CITY - 570 004. KARNATAKA. 2. SRI S.SRIDHAR S/O LATE SRIKANTAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BASAVESHWARA ROAD K.R. MOHALLA MYSURU CITY - 570 004 KARNATAKA. 3. SRI S.VENUGOPAL S/O LATE SRIKANTAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS BASAVESHWARA RAOD, K.R MOHALLA MYSURU CITY - 570 004 KARNATAKA. 4. SRI PARTHASARATHI S/O LATE SRIKANTAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010026732021 NC: 2026:KHC:45991 CRL.P No. 609 of 2021 BASAVESHWARA ROAD, K.R. ROAD, K.R. MOHALLA MYSURU CITY - 570 004 KARNATAKA. …PETITIONERS [BY SRI ARUN A. GADAG, ADVOCATE FOR P1 (AB)] AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY WOMEN POLICE STATION DEVARAJA DIVISION MYSURU REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. RAJESHWARI N., W/O UMASHANKAR S AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RA/T 3/A, MATHRUSHREE 10TH CROSS, JAYANAGARA MYSURU CITY - 570 014. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI SURYA MUKUNDARAJ L., ADDL. SPP FOR R1 (PH); SRI RUDRAPPA P., ADVOCATE FOR R2 (AB)] THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED 26.10.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND FIR AS PER ANNEXURE-B, CHARGE SHEET AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.116/2020, ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MYSURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010026732021 NC: 2026:KHC:45991 CRL.P No. 609 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging charge sheet and all further proceedings in CC no.116/2020 on file of VII Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru, this petition is filed. 2. There is no interim order granted. 3. Learned Additional SPP for respondent-State has filed a memo stating that during pendency of above petition, matter had progressed and charges were framed and matter was listed for evidence, rendering above petition infructuous as per decision in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Kumar reported in (1994) 4 SCC 142. Copy of case status of proceedings on e- Courts is appended to memo. 4. Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous reserving liberty to urge all contentions before trial Court. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21