IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11384 of 2015 ====================================================== Ranjit Singh Son of Late Sachchidanand Singh, Resident of Village - Mubarakpur, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 3. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 5. The Circle Officer, Chandi, District - Nalanda. 6. Sri Binda Singh, Son of Late Kamal Singh, 7. Nande Singh, Son of Late Rameshwar Singh, 8. Hargauri Singh, Son of Late Rameshwar Singh, 9. Permanand Singh, Son of Late Hriday Singh, 10. Vinay Singh, Son of Late Bali Singh, All respondet No. 6 and 10 are residents of village -Mubarakpur, P.S. - Chandi, District - Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12 For the Resp. No.7 : Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 8 08-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondents concerned to initiate an encroachment proceeding against the encroachers including whom whose names have Patna High Court CWJC No.11384 of 2015(8) dt.08-01-2026 2/2 come in the enquiry report of Anchal Amin dated 19.06.2007, submitted to Circle Officer, Chandi for removal of their encroachment upon the and pond/ditch and its adjoining area situated upon the land appertaining to Thana No.289, Khata No.111, Khesra No.917, Area 0.61 Acre in Mauza Mubarakpur in the Gram Panchayat, Tulsi Garh, Anchal Chandi, District-Nalanda, which is a Gair Mazarua Aam land.” 3. In this case on 27.11.2025, the petitioner was granted liberty to to file appropriate petition for substitution of the heirs of respondent no.7. 4. As it was a peremptory order and not complied, stood dismissed on 05.01.2026. 5. Perused the file, consigned. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U