Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35832 (KAR)

SRI SHANTAYYA HIREMATH v. THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL

WP/7081/2026 · 2026-08-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010157272026 NC: 2026:KHC:44518 WP No. 7081 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7081 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SHANTAYYA HIREMATH S/O SRI. GHANLINGAYYA HIREMATH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O G.D.A. PLOT NO. 34, BAPUGOUDA DHARSHANAPURA LAYOUT, SANTRASWADI, KALABURAGI - 585 101. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARAN N.MAJAGE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL OLD ELECTION COMMISSION BUILDING, NEAR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE SECRETARY THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL, OLD ELECTION COMMISSION BUILDING, NEAR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RITHISH D. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 - SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR ENROLMENT AS AN ADVOCATE DTD 13.05.2025 (ANNEXURE-D) AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS THEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010157272026 NC: 2026:KHC:44518 WP No. 7081 of 2026 LAW, WITHIN A TIME-FRAME TO BE STIPULATED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Rithish D. Naik who has appeared for respondent No.1 accepts notice for respondent No.2 also. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's application for enrolment as an Advocate dated 13.05.2025 (Annexure-D) and to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a time-frame to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; b) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application submitted by the petitioner on 13.05.2025 at Annexure-D has not been considered and the petitioner not enrolled as an advocate with the respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010157272026 NC: 2026:KHC:44518 WP No. 7081 of 2026 4. The counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that there are various reasons why it was not processed. Even if that were to be so, it was for respondent No.1 to have put down the said reasons in writing and issued the said order to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to take the matter forward. Same not having been done, this court passes the following: ORDER i. The petition is allowed. A mandamus is issued directing respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 13.05.2025 at Annexure-D and pass necessary orders within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ii. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner, same would have to be considered by respondents in accordance with law. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11