IN TH 129 Mohamma State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. appropriate Mandamus decide the terms of th keeping in in Madan S on 16.04.2 12.05.2026 titled Deep (Annexure or direction CWP-25325-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.25325 o Date of decision ammad Mubarak Versus of Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet opriate writ, order or direction, particu damus, directing the respondent au e the claim of the petitioner for regul s of the regularization policy dated 1 ing in view the judgment of the Hon’b dan Singh and others v. State of Ha .04.2026 (Annexure P-5), as wel 5.2026 passed by this Hon’ble Court Deepak Singh and others v. State exure P-6), and further for issuance o irection directing the respondents to 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5325 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate , DAG, Haryana. rit petition is for issuance of an particularly a writ in the nature of ent authorities to consider and r regularization of his services in ated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P-3), Hon’ble Supreme Court of India f Haryana and others, decided s well as the judgment dated Court in CWP No.1770 of 2026, State of Haryana and others ance of an appropriate writ, order ts to grant regularization to the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner i along with fixation of allowances with law. 2. petitioner t in the respo the Policy for regulari Moreover, It is (Annexure Madan Sin # 2884394. 3. petitioner w respondent 13.07.2026 laid down (supra). 4. 5. notice on objection’ CWP-25325-2026 (O & M) ioner in accordance with the aforesa with all consequential benefits, inclu ion of seniority, pay fixation, pay p ances and all other admissible servi It is inter alia submitted by ioner that the petitioner was appointed e respondent Department w.e.f. 01.1.2 olicy dated 18.6.2014 (Annexure P- egularization after having put in three y eover, the petitioner is still in service. It is further pointed out that the sai exure P-3) has been upheld by the H n Singh and others vs. State of Hary 394. Learned counsel for the pet ioner would be satisfied at this stage ndents to consider and decide .2026 (Annexure P-7) in a time boun down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Add e on behalf of respondent-State and ’ in case the prayer made by 2 aforesaid policy and judgments, s, including continuity of service, pay parity, arrears of pay and service benefits, in accordance ed by learned counsel for the pointed as Data Entry Operator 01.1.2011. As such, in terms of -3) the petitioner is entitled three years’ continuous service. vice. the said Policy dated 18.6.2014 the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Haryana: Law Finder Doc Id he petitioner submits that the tage if a direction is issued to ide the representation dated e bound manner, in view of law Court in Madan Singh’s case , Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts te and submits that she has ‘no de by learned counsel for the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioner a State coun ascertained service to m 6. said issue c Court in L State of Ha dated 23.04 CWP-25325-2026 (O & M) ioner at this stage, is accepted. It is counsel that the service tenure of rtained as to whether he has rendered ce to make him eligible for regularizat It is also pointed out by learn issue came for consideration before th t in LPA-1810-2025 titled as Aas M f Haryana and others, which was d 23.04.2026, relevant paras of which, “5. Today, when the matt informed that the Hon'ble Su decided the issue raised in t (supra) while considering a b vide judgment rendered in Ma State of Haryana, Civil App decided on 16.04.2026. 6. The judgment of the elaborately deals with the p framed by the State of Haryan principles laid down by the Uma Devi (supra), the perm available for the State to re employees has been elaborate 7. Learned Advocate Gen statement before the Court tha the State to examine the indiv employee (either appellants then separate orders would each of such claim keeping in 3 It is also submitted by learned re of the petitioner needs to be dered continuous and satisfactory larization. y learned State counsel that the fore the Division Bench of this s Mohammad and others vs. was disposed of vide judgment hich, read as under: - matter is taken up, we are le Supreme Court has finally in the case of Yogesh Tyagi a bunch of connected cases, n Madan Singh and others vs. Appeal No. 1996 of 2024, the Hon'ble Supreme Court the policy for regularization ryana and keeping in view the the Constitutional Bench in permissible course of action to regularize services of the rately specified. General, Haryana, makes a t that if a liberty is granted to ndividual claim of each of the ants or respondents herein), uld be passed in respect of ng in view the principles laid VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25325-2026 (O & M) down by the Hon'ble Suprem Madan Singh (supra). 8. Although various su advanced on behalf of the res but we are not inclined to delv view of the statement made General, Haryana, as per employees would be accorde the light of the judgment of th in the case of Madan Singh (su 9. In that view of the ma disposed of with a direct Haryana/its Bodies/Corporati consideration to the claim of e batch of cases by passing a sp their claim for regularizatio months. The judgment of th under appeal stands modifi principles laid down by the H the case of Madan Singh (su order in respect of claim of passed, status quo as exists to It goes without saying that th based on policy of 2011 consideration keeping in view by the Hon'ble Supreme Cou Singh (supra) and the order batch of appeals/writ petition way of fresh consideration o for regularization. 10. In order to facilitate claim of the individual em employee to submit a compre 4 preme Court in the case of submissions have been e respondents writ petitioners delve upon such arguments in ade by the learned Advocate er which, the claim of all orded fresh consideration in of the Hon'ble Supreme Court h (supra). e matter, all the appeals are irection upon the State of oration/Nigam to accord fresh of employees involved in this a speaking order in respect of ation within a period of six of the learned Single Judge odified in the light of the he Hon'ble Supreme Court in (supra). Till an appropriate of each of the employees is ts today would be maintained. at the claim of regularization 11 will also be accorded view the principles laid down Court in the case of Madan rder impugned in the present titions would not come in the on of the claim of employees ate a fresh consideration of employee, we direct each prehensive representation to VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 7. disposed of 8. ‘no objectio 9. the parties, the above o and othe Haryana/co claim of p thereupon w in mind th Supreme C 10. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-25325-2026 (O & M) the department along with a c period of two weeks from the copy of this order. 11. All pending misc. app stand disposed of.” It is prayed that the presen sed of in the above terms. Learned counsel for the petiti bjection’ to the same. Accordingly, with the consen arties, present Civil Writ Petition stand bove order dated 23.04.2026 passed in others (supra); with a direct ana/concerned Department to accord of petitioner for regularization; an upon within a period of 06 months ind the judgment dated 16.04.2026 eme Court in Madan Singh’s case (S Pending application(s) if any a 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 5 h a copy of this order within a the date of receipt of certified pplication(s), if any, also present writ petition be also e petitioner submits that he has sent of learned counsel for n stands disposed of in terms of ssed in case of Aas Mohammad direction to the State of ccord fresh consideration to the on; and pass a speaking order from today, while keeping .2026 passed by the Hon’ble e (Supra). f any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document