Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35827 (CHH)

SUDEEP SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/873/2026 · 2026-09-15

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010336292026 2026:CGHC:40358 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 873 of 2026 Sudeep Shrivastava S/o M.K. Shrivastava Aged About 40 Years (Now Aged About 44 Years), R/o B-19, Vasundhara Vihar, District - Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Higher Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Technical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University Through Its Registrar, Newai, P.O. Newai, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sant Gahira Guru Vishwavidyalaya Through Its Registrar, Sarguja, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Dr. Ram Narayan Khare Principal Sant Gahira Guru Vishwavidyalaya, Surguja, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudeep Shrivastava, in person. For State : Mr. K.S. Saini, Deputy G.A. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. K.R. Nair, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Majoj Khare, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge Order on Board 16.09.2026 1. The present application has been moved for restoration of WPS No. 4621 of 2022 which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.08.2026. 2. Petitioner in person would submit that on account of some unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear before this Court when the matter was taken up for hearing, therefore, WPS No. 4621 of 2022 was dismissed for want of prosecution. He would submit that the applicant/petitioner is interested in pursuing the matter. He would pray to restore the petition to its original number. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by Mr. Sudeep Shrivastava, petitioner in person, the instant MCC for restoration of WPS No. 4621 of 2022 is hereby allowed. The WPS No. 4621 of 2022 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2000/- payable to Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee, Bilaspur. 3 5. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of. - Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Kunal