MAYABEN JAYESH MISTRY AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
WPA/8145/2020 · 2026-08-25
Arjun Ray Mukherjee, Shampa Sarkar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35821 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35821 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
25.08.2026 Court No. 12 Item No. 09 Sandip
WPA 8145 of 2020 Mayaben Jayesh Mistry & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr. Mr. Avinash Kankani, Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty …for the UOI.
1. Learned advocate for the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the disqualification period is over.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. No accommodation is prayed for.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
4. The reference is not decided as the writ petitioners do not appear.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)