Date of reserved for orders Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010288002026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 29 THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 15133/2026 Between: 1. PICHALA PARANDHAMA REDDY, S/O P NARAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D NO. 5 BUKKPATNAM MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 516361 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT - 515134 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHA CHERUVU, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BUKKAPATNAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT -515144 7. SMT C NAGAMANI, W/O SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, Date of reserved for orders : : 29.06.2026 : 30.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15133/2026 PICHALA PARANDHAMA REDDY, S/O P NARAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D NO. 5-157, JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKPATNAM MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT-515144 ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 516361 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA 515134 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT -515134 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHA CHERUVU, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT -515133 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BUKKAPATNAM, SRI SATYA SAI SMT C NAGAMANI, W/O SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM PICHALA PARANDHAMA REDDY, S/O P NARAPA REDDY, AGED 157, JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, 515144 ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 516361 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHA CHERUVU, SRI INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BUKKAPATNAM, SRI SATYA SAI SMT C NAGAMANI, W/O SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM MANDAL, 2 MRK,J W.P.No.15133 of 2026 SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 515144 8. SRI P KRISHNA REDDY, S/O TIPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O VENGALAMMA CHERU VILLAGE, PUTTAPARTHI MANDAL SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 515144 9. GUNDURU YALLAMMA, W/O GUNDURU LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O D NO. 5/458, JANAKAMPALLI VILLAGE, BUKKAPATNAM POST AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT - 515144 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the property in Sy.No. 1699-3, Bukkapatnam village, and continuously calling the Petitioner to the police station at the instance of unofficial Respondents 7 and 8 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and without jurisdiction Consequently direct Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents, and to cease calling the Petitioner to the police station in relation to this dispute and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police, more particularly the 5th respondent and 6th Respondent, not to interfere with the civil dispute Petitioner and the unofficial Respondents, and not to call the petitioner to the police station or harass him in any manner, except by following due process of law pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 MRK,J W.P.No.15133 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has addressed a letter, dated 24.06.2026, to the Registrar (Judicial), seeking permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 29.06.2026 MDP Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No