Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35803 (CHH)

VYAS NARAYAN BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4679/2026 · 2026-09-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010346302026 2026:CGHC:40219 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4679 of 2026 • Vyas Narayan Banjare S/o Shri Man Singh Banjare, Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village Nagaradih, Tahsil Bodri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.), Sub Division Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. Ishwari Dhruv, Aged About 50 Years Sarpanch, R/o. Village Kaneri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .... Non -Applicant No. 01. 6. Satya, S/o Shri Jayram, Aged About 50 Years R/o. Village Kaneri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .... Non-Applicant No.02. 7. Karan Jangde, S/o Shri Budhram, Aged About 45 Years Panch, R/o. Village Panchayat Kaneri / Durgdih, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .... Non- Applicant No. 03. 8. Vijay Yadav, S/o Shri Bharat Yadav, Aged About 40 Years Panch, R/o. Village Panchayat Kaneri / Durgdih, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ....Applicant No.04. 9. Amit Banjare, S/o Shri Sant Kumar Banjare, Aged About 35 Years Panch, R/o. Village Panchayat Kaneri / Durgdih, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .... Non-Applicant No.05. 10. Dilesh Dhritlahre, S/o Shri Bhaiyaram, Aged About 32 Years Panch, R/o. Village Kaneri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ...... Non-Applicant No. 06. 11. Sona Bai Koshle, S/o. Shri Monwa, R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.)...... Non-Applicant No. 07. 12. Dilendra Kumar, S/o Shri Bhaiyaram, Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 13. Dinesh S/o Shri Durga Prasad, Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 14. Mukesh S/o Shri Durga Prasad, Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village Kanery Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 15. Nitesh Kumar, S/o Shri Milan, Aged About 32 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 16. Amit Gendle, S/o Shri Dhaniram, Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 17. Arjun S/o Shri Dhaniram, Aged About 28 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 18. Narendra, S/o Shri Bhaiyaram, Aged About 29 Years R/o. Village Kanery Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 19. Sant Kumar, S/o Shri Kapdas, Aged About 30 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 20. Lokeshwar S/o Shri Santosh, Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 21. Chinta, S/o Shri Santosh, Aged About 37 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 22. Suraj, S/o Shri Rajju Prasad, Aged About 40 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 23. Radhika, D/o. Shri Suresh Yadav, Aged About 37 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 24. Chhotelal, S/o Shri Sukalu Nishad, Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Kanery, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 25. The Halka Patwari, Patwari Halka No.27 Village Kaneri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Deputy G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/09/2026 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court, may kindly call for the entire record in relates to the case of the petitioner. 3 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ or writs, order or orders, to direct the Respondent Tahsildar, Bilha to comply with his own order dated 30.03.2026 (Annexure- P/1) and remove the encroacher within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon’ble Court, deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the relief clause, petitioner has prayed for the direction to the Tahsildar, Bilha to comply with his own order dated 30.03.2026 (Annexure-P/1) and remove the encroacher within the stipulated period. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objections with regard to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 5. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, particularly considering the relief clause prayed by the petitioner, it would be appropriate to direct the Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) to consider the grievance of the petitioner in light of the order passed by the concerned Tahsildar. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of directing the concerned Collector to pass an appropriate direction to the Tahsildar, Bilha (C.G.) to comply with the order dated 30.03.2026. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha