Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:2951 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS 639/2026
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Standing Counsel, for the State.
(2) Petitioner was put under suspension vide order dated 21.2.2026 and he was attached to Sitarganj. Earlier, he was posted at Jaspur. Feeling aggrieved by his suspension, petitioner has filed this writ petition.
(3) Since suspension is not a punishment, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the suspension
order. Writ petition is, however, disposed of granting liberty to petitioner to make representation to the Chief Education Officer regarding his attachment to some other place nearer to Jaspur. If he makes representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken by the competent authority within four weeks thereafter.
(4) It goes without saying that the disciplinary enquiry shall be completed against the petitioner, as per law, uninfluenced by any observation made by this Court earlier.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
22.4.2026 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F 3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.04.22 18:05:40 +05'30'
2026:UHC:2951