Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3578 (BOM)

ANDHERI RECREATION CLUB AND ORS v. RAJESH CHUNILAL MEGHANI AND ANR

WP/8468/2026 · 2026-08-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28 WP-8468-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8468 OF 2026 Andheri Recreation Club & ors. ..Petitioners Versus Rajesh Chunilal Meghani & anr. …Respondents Mr. Ram Apte, Sr. Advocate, a/w Mr. Rajkumar Mishra, i/b Mr. Dilip Shukla, for the Petitioners. Mr. Priyadarshan V Shah, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Y D Patil, AGP for Respondent – State. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 24th August 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Apte, the learned Senior Advocate, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 3. Leave granted. 4. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The petitioners – defendants are at liberty to raise all the grounds, as available in law, by way of additional written statement to the amended plaint to be filed within a period of one month from today. SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.08.25 14:55:56 +0530 28 WP-8468-26.DOC 6. All contentions of the parties are kept open for adjudication at the trial. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2