Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35766 (CAL)

BISWANATH KAR v. M/S. MILLENIUM INDIA CONSTRUCTION REPT BY DEBASISH SARKAR AND SAMIR KUMAR HALDER AND OTHERS

CO/2674/2026 · 2026-08-14

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 14.08.2026 (AD 20) (S. Banerjee) CO 2674 of 2026 Sri Biswanath Kar Vs. M/s. Millenium India Construction & Ors. Mr. Aditya Mondal Mr. Washim Akthir Dafader …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 5th Court at Alipore to dispose of Title Suit No. 1207 of 2019 expeditiously. From the order-sheets appended to this application this Court finds that August 26, 2026 has been fixed for show-cause by the petitioner and for acceptance of the written statement filed by the defendant no. 5. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the hearing of an injunction application is still pending. From the order-sheets appended to this application this Court does not find that any date for hearing of the injunction application has been fixed recently. 2 In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order, upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocate representing them before the learned trial judge forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner this civil revision application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 5th Court at Alipore to take up the hearing on the issue of show- cause by the plaintiff on the next date fixed, i.e., on August 26, 2026, and for acceptance of the written statement filed by the defendant no. 5 and to pass orders in accordance with law. In the event the injunction application is still pending, petitioner will be at liberty to draw the attention of the learned trial judge with regard to such fact and if the learned trial judge is approached with such a prayer, a date for hearing of the injunction application shall be fixed in accordance with law. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)