Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35757 (PNJ)

BALKARAN SINGH v. SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER AND OTHERS

CWP/23438/2026 · 2026-08-18

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[134] Balkaran S Superintend Circle, Fero Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] writ petitio [2] [3] disposed of 18.08.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA CWP-2343 Date of De aran Singh versus rintending Canal Officer, Ferozepur C e, Ferozepur, Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Surinder Pal Singh Tinna, for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advoca Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advoc for respondent No.5. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner pray petition with liberty to file a fresh peti Dismissed as withdrawn with All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 23438-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 18.08.2026 …Petitioner epur Canal ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Tinna, Advocate Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. dvocate with Advocate er prays for withdrawal of the present sh petition with better particulars. with the liberty, as prayed for. neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No resent stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.08.18 17:29 I agree to specified portions of this document