Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35742 (MAD)

A.PRABAKARAN v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP/19646/2026 · 2026-06-09

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19646 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 19646 of 2026 A.Prabakaran, S/o. Aiyyasamy, 2/7, Gokulam Phase I, Sri Ram Nagar Main Road, Nolambur, Chennai- 600 095. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration No. 100 Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028. 2. The Sub Registrar, Konnur, Chennai – 600 049. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.11.2025 to make necessary remark in the encumbrance register cancelling the unalwful lease deed registered in document No. 841 of 2018 dated 23.02.2018 with regard to property situated at Shed No. 193- B Ambattur Industrial Estate comprised in Survey No. 104 (Part) Pattaravakkam village , Ambattur Taluk, Tiruvallur District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ramkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.Dominic S.David Government Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19646 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.11.2025. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioners has given a representation dated 27.11.2025 to make necessary remark in the encumbrance register cancelling the unlawful lease deed registered in document No. 841 of 2018 dated 23.02.2018 with regard to property situated at Shed No. 193- B Ambattur Industrial Estate comprised in Survey No. 104 (Part) Pattaravakkam village , Ambattur Taluk, Tiruvallur District. Since no order has been passed, the present writ petition is filed. 3. In reply, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 27.11.2025 will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 5. In view of the above, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.11.2025 on its own merits and dispose https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19646 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 of the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN To 1. The Inspector General of Registration No. 100 Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028. 2. The Sub Registrar, Konnur, Chennai – 600 049. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19646 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN WP No. 19646 of 2026 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis