D/L71 25.08.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (A) 2767 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with PT No.023629 of 2026 arising out of Banshihari Police Station as 01/26 as zero FIR, date 01.07.2026 in connection with Bamongola Police Station Case No.150 of 2026 dated 14.07.2026 under Sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109(2)/91/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Jyotshna Kha & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mallick Mr. Pikesh Kumar Chauhan. …for the petitioners. Mr. Goutam Dey Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 is the mother-in-law and the petitioner no.2 is the brother-in-law. Marriage was solemnized in the year 2023. The accusations are of cryptic nature. As such, learned advocate submits that the petitioners may be released on anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the witnesses including the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the overall materials and on an 2 assessment, I of the view that so far as the present petitioners are concerned, their custodial detention is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner no.1, namely, Jyotshna Kha and the petitioner no.2, namely, Kamal Kha shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is in progress, the petitioner no.2 shall report to the investigating officer of the case within a period of 10 days from date and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the investigating officer of the case for the sake of investigation. Thus, CRM(A) 2767 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3