14.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 27. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 1788 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 1058 of 2025 dated 16.06.2025 under sections 191(2)/191(3)/190/126(2)/118(2)/109/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 25(1-B)(a)/27/29 of the Arms Act, 1959. And In the matter of : Enamul Sekh @ Anamul Sk @ China ……Petitioner. Ms. Sabrina Parveen ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. State has produced the case diary and submitted that it is at the behest of the present petitioner and under his leadership, a riot was organized and arms were used, firing took place. Having considered the series of incidents which are reflecting in the case diary in support of the contentions, I am of the view that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. 2 Accordingly, CRM (A) 1788 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)