25.08.2026 Court No.551 Item No.31 tbsr Allowed CRM (A) 2529 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Galsi P.S. Case No. 170 of 2026 dated 04.03.2026 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109(1)/74/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Babu Ghosh ….Petitioner. Mr. Swapnil Mukherjee Mr. Ketan Makharia Mr. Soumyadeep Das Mr. S. N. Banerjee …for the petitioner. Mr. Brajesh Jha Mr. S. Ghosh Ms. Sanjana Jha …..for the State. 1. Memo of evidence filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous grudge. The petitioner happens to be a neighbour of the de facto complainant. It is further submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner is a student of engineering. He submits that he has committed no offence at all. He further submits that two accused persons have been granted bail by the learned jurisdictional Court. He prays of anticipatory bail. 3. On the other hand, the learned advocate for the State refers to the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 180 of BNSS. She opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 2 4. On going through the materials in the case diary and upon hearing the rival contentions of the learned advocate for the parties, it appears that the petitioner and five others are alleged to have assaulted the de facto complainant and her husband with iron rod and other deadly weapons. As a result of such incident, the husband of the de facto compliant sustained injuries and was medically treated for such injuries. 5. I have gone through the injury report contained in the case diary. The injury report shows injuries on a scalp, forehead and left leg of one of the victims, whereas no external injury was found by the Medical Officer on the person of the other injured person. None of the injuries has been classified as grievous. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and materials in the case diary, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. 1. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date 3 fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 2. CRM (A) 2529 of 2026 is disposed of. 3. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)