R/CR.MA/21539/2026(GJHC240697662026) ORDER DATED: 16/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 21539 of 2026 ========================================================== SAHILBHAI S/O RAHIMBHAI UMARBHAI RAVKARDA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR OM PRAKASH SHUKLA(18921) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR ADITYA JADEJA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 16/09/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State. [2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11190002230403 of 2023 registered with Botad Police Station, District Botad for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 354-A, 354-B, 323, 504, 506(2) and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. [3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the present applicant was granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 07.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.14876 of 2023 however, the applicant could not remain present before the learned trial Court since he was in custody in connection with another offence and therefore, the learned trial Court issued NBW which was served upon the applicant in custody. Further, the applicant came to be enlarged on regular bail in connection with another offence vide order dated 05.08.2026 passed in CR.MA No.18091/2026 and thus, the applicant is behind the bars in connection with the present offence. Upon instructions, he has submitted that the applicant shall regularly attend the Court proceedings. Hence, the present application is filed seeking regular bail. R/CR.MA/21539/2026(GJHC240697662026) ORDER DATED: 16/09/2026 [4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Following aspects have been considered: (1) Applicant was already granted regular bail by this Court; (2) He could not remain present before the learned trial Court because of which arrest warrant came to be issued and applicant came to be arrested and is behind the bars since 03.08.2026; (3) The applicant could not mark his presence since he was in custody in connection with another offence and since notice was issued to the surety, surety got discharged; (4) The applicant has assured this Court that he will remain present before the learned trial Court as and when date of trial will be fixed and shall regularly attend the trial proceedings. [7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the R/CR.MA/21539/2026(GJHC240697662026) ORDER DATED: 16/09/2026 Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11190002230403 of 2023 registered with Botad Police Station, District Botad on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court; R/CR.MA/21539/2026(GJHC240697662026) ORDER DATED: 16/09/2026 (g) regularly attend the Court and engage an Advocate and in the event of his absence, shall mark presence through his Advocate; (h) not indulge in any type of illegal activity and shall abide by all conditions imposed by the concerned learned Sessions Court, failing which, concerned learned Sessions Court is at liberty to issue warrant against the applicant and applicant can be taken into judicial custody; (i) learned trial Court is at liberty to impose any further condition to secure the presence of the applicant during trial. [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) Ajay Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/09/2026 14:27:56