1 CGHC010127042021 2026:CGHC:40221 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2266 of 2021 1 - Rajesh Kumar Mishra S/o Late Radha Mohan Mishra Aged About 39 Years R/o House No. 47/6, Nehru Nagar (West), Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Petitioner In Person), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter , Indrawat Bhavan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Amresh Kumar Mishra Former Superintendent Of Police, Durg, C/o Police Headquarter, Indrawati Bhavan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Pragya Meshram Additional Superintendent Of Police I.C.U.A.W. Durg , District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Dilip Chandrakar Deputy Superintendent Of Police I.C.U.A.W. Durg , District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - C. Tirkey Station House Officer, Police Station , Mahila Police Thana , Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV 2 6 - Chitralekha Sharma Former Officer Incharge , Mahila Police Station, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 7 - Shashikanta Sahu Former Investigating Officer , Mahila Police Station, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 8 - Police Family Advice Centre Bhilai Durg , District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/09/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1) That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call the entire record pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondents for kind perusal. 10.2) That, the Hon'ble Court by issuing appropriate writ direct the respondent no.1 for taking appropriate action against the respondent no. 2 to 8 for unlawful act performed by the concerned respondent authorities against the petitioner in persons. 10.3) That, the Hon'ble Court by issuing appropriate writ direct the respondent no.1 to calculate the mental harassment and financial losses caused to the petitioner in person for unlawful 3 act of respondent no.2 to 8 and the same should be provided to the petitioner in person at the earliest. 10.4) Any other relief or relief (s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. It appears that on the previous dates of hearing, i.e., 07.09.2021, 17.06.2025 and 13.08.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Today also, when the case is called out, none appears on behalf of the petitioner, nor is any representation made on his/her behalf to press the petition. This indicates that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi