- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010395052025 NC: 2026:KHC:42219-DB CCC No. 729 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 729 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. AKKAYAMMA W/O LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT GUNDUR VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI MANDUR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 571 428 2. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT GUNDUR VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI MANDUR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 571 428 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI SHARATH S. GOWDA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010395052025 NC: 2026:KHC:42219-DB CCC No. 729 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI TEJAS KUMAR THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK K.R. PURAM BENGLAURU - 571 428 …ACCUSED 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER/DIRECTION DATED 21.06.2024 IN W.P.NO.10528/2022 C/W W.P.NO.10441/2022 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE, IN EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010395052025 NC: 2026:KHC:42219-DB CCC No. 729 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainants have filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 21.06.2024 passed in WP.No.10528/2022 (KLR-RES). The learned counsel appearing for the accused fairly points out that the State has preferred an appeal (W.A.No.1759/2024) against said order and this Court had directed that the matter be referred to a larger bench, which has since been constituted. The order passed in the appeal also indicates, prima facie, reservations regarding the impugned order. 2. In view of the above, the present complaint is closed with liberty to the complainants to revive the same, subject to the outcome of the decision in WA.No.1759/2024. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9